Skip to content


HOW ASTHMA MEDICATIONS CAN BE EFFECTIVELY DELIVERED? IHHALATION METHOD – – WHEN NEBULIZERS ARE HELPFUL

Nebulizer use is also helpful when a child is prone to moderate or severe attack of asthma, specially at night. Currently, salbutamol, a bronchodilator, is vised for nebulization.
The effect of nebulisation lasts for at least four hours. By that time, other medication given orally becomes effective. If the effect of nebulized medicine last for less than two hours, then other medicines, either in the form of tablets or injections may be given. Steroids and deriphylline injection may be used, even with repeated nebulization by the physician. In very severe attacks, when the child develops cyanosis (blue colour) due to deficiency of oxygen in the blood, nebulization of medicine is combined, in the nebulizer, with the administration of oxygen. Oxygen delivery of up to 5 litres per minute is necessary to produce sufficient force for the production of the aerosol mist.
The use of nebulizer can prove to be harmful if a child suffering from persistent severe attacks is not given steroids, either in the form of injections or tablets, together with the medication through nebulizer. The child’s condition can become precarious if steroids are not given at this stage.
*76\260\8*

Posted in Asthma.


ARTHRITIS: CALCIUM FOODS ARE A PROBLEM

In addition to keeping the cartilage elastic— by adding proper oils through correct diet—there is one other step which the arthritic should take. You should keep a close watch on how calcium enters your body. Be sure calcium-bearing foods are eaten at the right time . . . and we will tell you the correct way to consume such foods later in this book.
Unless you are careful, calcium deposits may occur on your bones and complicate your arthritis. When not absorbed properly, calcium particles will attach themselves on to the bone near the cartilage. Spicules, daggers of calcium, will knife into the cartilage and cause it to become frayed and worn.
As the frayed cartilage is subject to more and more mechanical wear, the cartilage finally disintegrates, adding to your acute pain and your arthritis.
While watching your intake of calcium foods, remember that their effect on your arthritis is only dangerous if they are eaten in the wrong way. If you set up a conflict between calcium foods and certain liquids, harmful deposits will result. Milk and calcium foods can be beneficial only if you know how and when to eat them. You will find additional chapters on this subject as you read on.
*7\146\2*

Posted in Arthritis.


ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT

Alcoholism treatment is nothing more (or less) than the interventions designed to short-circuit the alcoholic process and provide an introduction to a sober, drug-free existence. Alcoholism is the third leading cause of death in the United States. It shouldn’t be. In comparison to other chronic disease, it is significantly more treatable. Virtually any alcoholic who seeks assistance and is willing to actively participate in rehabilitation efforts can realistically expect to lead a happy, productive life. Sadly, the same is not true for a victim of cancer, heart disease, or emphysema. The realization that alcoholism is treatable is becoming more widespread. The public efforts of prominent individuals who are recovering has contributed to this acceptance. Both professional treatment programs and AA are discovering that alcoholics today are often younger and in the early or middle stages of alcoholism when they seek help. It is imperative for the helping professions to keep firmly in mind the hopefulness that surrounds treatment.
Just as people initially become involved with alcohol for a variety of reasons, there is similar variety in what prompts treatment. For every person who wends his way into alcoholism, there is also an exit route. This exit is most easily accomplished with professional help. The role of the counselor or therapist is to serve as a guide, to share knowledge of the terrain, to be a support as the alcoholic regains his footing, and to provide encouragement. The counselor cannot make the trip for the alcoholic but can only point the way. The counselor’s goal for treatment, the destination of the journey, is to assist the alcoholic in becoming comfortable and at ease in the world, able to handle his life situation. This will require the alcoholic to stop drinking. In our experience, a drinking alcoholic cannot be happy, healthy, at peace with himself, or alive in any way that makes sense to him, not to us. The question for the counselor is never “How can I make him stop?” The only productive focus for the counselor is “How can I create an atmosphere in which he is better able to choose sobriety for himself?”
In this discussion, abstinence is presumed to be required for alcoholism treatment. There was a time when researchers were actively exploring controlled drinking as an alternative. The optimism that was initially reported was met with scepticism by veteran alcoholism clinicians. When the fates of those treated by controlled drinking were examined, the sceptics were proven right. In virtually all cases, there was serious relapse and further alcohol problems. Vaillant, when questioned as to an alcoholic’s ability to resume social drinking, uses the example of a motorist who decides to remove the spare tire from the car trunk. Disaster may not strike the next day, or the next week, or even within the month. But sooner or later… And the seriousness of the consequences cannot be predicted ahead of time. It may be only a flat tire in one’s driveway, or it may be on a very busy freeway during rush hour.
Abstinence as a requisite for a solid recovery appears to have a physiological basis. Tolerance once established is maintained, even in the absence of further alcohol use. Were someone who has been abstinent for a considerable period to resume drinking, the person would very quickly be physically capable of drinking amounts consistent with the highest levels previously consumed. Drinking isn’t resumed with a physiologically “clean slate.” It may have taken ten or more years for an alcoholic to reach a consumption level of a fifth a day, though that level can be reinstated within literally days, even after a decade of sobriety.
*96\331\2*

Posted in Anti Depressants-Sleeping Aid.


TREATING ALLERGIC REACTIONS: METHODS AND TESTS

Doctors also can desensitize allergic reactions in patients. One method entails giving weekly injections of the offending protein in gradually increasing amounts until the reaction to it subsides. Then shots are given monthly to prevent further allergy attacks.
There is proof that desensitization works for patients allergic to bee stings. Bee-sting allergy can kill – by stopping your breathing. And desensitization does work in hay fever and other pollen allergies, but not for everybody and not every time. Before desensitizing you, an allergist will test you, putting tiny amounts of various substances under your skin. Those that create itchy red welts are the offending allergens. Doctors also can measure IgE directly in the blood.
No other allergy test works. Some doctors have used the “cytotoxic” test for food allergies, in which a patient’s white blood cells are isolated and tested for their reaction to food products in small amounts. If the cells die, the patient is pronounced allergic to those food products. The American Academy of Allergy and Immunology says the cytotoxic test has no scientific basis.
One way to control allergic reaction is to avoid the substances that trigger your allergies.
Mites are hard to avoid. The tiny pests are found everywhere. They grow in damp carpets and mattresses. And when their bodies fall to dust, their proteins get in your nose and lungs. They provoke allergic reactions, particularly in asthmatics. So do cockroaches.
Thorough housecleaning and frequent vacuuming to prevent dust accumulation can help dramatically to eliminate allergic reactions caused by these pests.
All the scientists with whom we spoke forecast a bright future for allergy and asthma sufferers. As biologists have uncovered the mysteries that cause allergy, chemists have gone to work to put those discoveries to quick use.
*3/266/5*

Posted in Allergies.


ASTHMA AND BREASTFEEDING

There is a theory that the original onset of asthma in a susceptible individual is initiated by a virus. If this theory is correct, then it is additionally beneficial for the infant of an asthmatic parent to be breastfed. Breast milk contains disease fighting antibodies which could be significant in reducing the infant’s susceptibility to viruses and related illnesses. A baby born into a family with a history of asthma is much more likely to develop an asthmatic condition than a baby with no family history of asthma.
Most doctors and health care professionals encourage otherwise healthy asthmatic mothers, with the exception of those on certain drugs, to breastfeed their babies. Some drugs taken by a mother pass through her breast milk to the baby. Fortunately, most prescribed anti-asthma drugs are not known to be harmful to the baby. Other drugs, including iodine containing mixtures and tetracycline antibiotics, should be avoided. It is important to clarify with your doctor which drugs can be safely taken during lactation. Mixing certain drugs together, even such commonly used drugs as aspirin, can cause side effects such as rashes, nausea, diarrhea and constipation in the infant. No new drug should be taken during lactation without first checking with a doctor.
An asthmatic mother who has been identified as having food allergies should be particularly careful with her diet while breastfeeding, avoiding foods which are known to trigger an allergic response.
*42\148\2*

Posted in Asthma.


WIPING OUT ALLERGIES

A tiny speck of dust lands on the inside lining of your nose. Within minutes, the spot flushes red and swells up. You sneeze. Your nostril pours out fluid. More dust. More sneezes. More fluid. It’s hay fever. You have a full-blown allergy attack.
Something is out of kilter in your immune system. This system that fights viruses, bacteria, and fungi now overreacts to that plant particle. You suffer the misery of a runny nose, itching, red eyes, headache, and congestion. Worse, you could end up with asthma, a disease that throttles breathing.
Forty-one million Americans – one in six – suffer from allergy, a disordered immune response. They spend up to 5 billion dollars a year warding off the ill effects of plant pollen, mold, mites, spores, foods, animal hairs, even cockroach dust.
Help is on the way: Scientists have made two basic biological discoveries that could in a decade vanquish allergies – no more sneezes, wheezes, itches, running noses, bleary eyes; no more fearful reactions to a piece of fish.
Dr. Gillian Shepherd, head of the allergy clinic at the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center in Manhattan, says that the new findings could one day put her out of business.
“One discovery could lead directly to drugs that interrupt the immune system’s overreaction,” Dr. Shepherd says. “The second finding has pinpointed natural substances that turn off that system.”
Leslie Naschek, 28, an accountant in New York City, can hardly wait. “I’m allergic to dust, weeds, and grass,” she says. “Two years ago, I suddenly started having a runny nose and sneezing. It’s difficult, walking around with a tissue in your hand all the time. I couldn’t sleep. I took antihistamines. They helped, but not a lot.”
Giant drug companies are searching for those chemicals that will cut short the allergic reaction. Three compounds currently are being tested in allergic patients.
And in medical laboratories worldwide, scientists have come close to unraveling the mystery of allergy attacks.
Leslie Naschek, researchers found, fell victim to chemical reactions in her blood tissues. To take a peek at the allergic reaction, let’s start with a grain of ragweed pollen. Under the microscope, it looks like a basketball with thorns.
On the ragweed pollen’s surface lies a protein molecule too tiny to see, even with a microscope. It consists of long chains of thousands of atoms of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen. Living things produce hundreds of such proteins, each of a different size and shape.
When that ragweed pollen lands on the nostril’s lining, it finds its way to a living white blood cell, called a mast cell. The mast cell responds as if struck by an ax. It pours out a dozen chemicals, among them histamine. Histamine flows to nerve receptors, causing itching. Histamine makes blood vessels leak serum, resulting in a runny nose and teary eyes. The chemical also contracts the airways (bronchi) of your lungs, slowing airflow. A host of other proteins – such as pollens, dust particles, cat dander, insect dust – can trigger similar reactions.
*1/266/5*

Posted in Allergies.


Бронхиальная астма

(аспирин и другие лекарства)
Согласно статистике, двое из ста человек аллергичны к аспирину – пожалуй, одному из наиболее популярных лекарств в мире. Предполагается, что от восьми до двадцати процентов всех астматиков гипервосприимчивы к аспирину. У таких людей после употребления самого аспирина или вещества, его содержащего, моментально краснеют глаза, начинается обильное выделение из носа, после чего может последовать сильный приступ астмы.
Если у человека астма, да ещё гипервосприимчивость к аспирину, то лучше всего никогда его не употреблять, а пользоваться вполне эффективными его заменителями – например, таким, как ацетаминфен (тиленол и датрил), который не вызывает приступов астмы. И не поленитесь почитать инструкцию к покупаемым препаратам. Самыми популярными препаратами, включающими в себя аспирин, являются: алка-сельцер, анацин, байер аспирин, буфферин, экотрин и эмпирин, эксцедрин, мидол и перкодан.
Два других типа препарата также представляют серьёзную угрозу для астматиков. Это седативные средства и бета-блокаторы. Чаще всего врачи выписывают бета-блокаторы для понижения сердцебиения и давления, а также при ангине. Их возможное побочное действие -
сжатие бронхов. Наиболее используемыми бета-блокаторами являются: индерал, лопрессор, индерид и блокадрен. Если вы принимаете бета-блокаторы, то обязательно говорите об этом врачам: кардиологу и терапевту.
Астматикам, даже если болезнь не слишком их беспокоит, не стоит принимать седативные средства, успокаивающие или снотворные препараты. Эти лекарства могут не только обострить симптомы астмы, но и привести к летальному исходу. Чаще всего врачи выписывают следующие седативные препараты: валиум, торазин и либриум. Седативные препараты и барбитураты, прописанные в качестве успокоительного, отрицательно воздействуют на респираторную систему, отчего астматику становится труднее дышать. При постоянном приёме седативные средства разрушают респираторную систему до такой степени, что астматик может неожиданно упасть в обморок и задохнуться от нехватки кислорода. Ни под каким видом не принимайте седативных средств прежде, чем проконсультируетесь с врачом.

навязчивые действия

 

Posted in Asthma.


ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE: JUDGMENT AND PERSONALITY

Judgment
It is well recognized that a sufferer’s judgment becomes impaired quite early on. This is especially serious when the condition affects people who are still working and when they have to make difficult, complex decisions (doctors, drivers, judges, etc.)
Obviously the person may later be at risk from being ‘taken in’ by unscrupulous people and can be easily made to part with money and valuables, etc. Carers may need to take on the role of financial organizer if money problems develop. Home helps frequently cash pensions for their clients, buy the groceries and help pay the bills.
Personality
Personality and general behaviour also alter with this condition. For many they are their old selves albeit with memory and orientation problems. Some however have very up and down (labile) moods. An underlying feature of the personality before the disease may come to the fore, such as a tendency to anxiety or verbal spitefulness. In the later stages underlying characteristics may become very predominant and cause problems (verbal aggression, continuing anxiety requiring continuous reassurance). Often personal hygiene becomes a particular problem, especially for carers. Washing and bathing may become infrequent (often it is forgotten) and the person may then develop marked body odour. This can be made worse if clothing is stained with urine (many sufferers appear to leave the toilet before being quite finished, hence wetting their clothes). Less time and attention is taken with wiping their bottom, leading to soiled clothing and messy hands.
Carers are particularly anxious to avoid social embarrassment as occurs with inappropriate urination or having one’s bowels open in public. Undressing, accidental ‘flashing’ and the fondling of private parts are the other dreaded occurrences. In fact these acts do not occur often and can usually be prevented or minimized. A sense of proportion also has to be taken into account as it is not the act itself or the audience that should cause concern but the loss of dignity for the person concerned. It reminds me of a story (definitely true) that I heard recently. A rather posh woman was receiving skiing instruction as part of her expensive winter holiday. One afternoon high on the mountain with her instructor and about thirty other people she needed to pass urine quickly. She demurely approached her instructor who advised her to go behind a convenient boulder. This she did and gratefully lowered her ski pants and crouched down. Her instructor, ski party and everyone else on the mountain were thus shocked to see her bare bottom come into view and glide gracefully past them as she went backwards down the slope frantically trying to stop peeing and moving at the same time! The hot liquid had melted the snow and caused her to slide down the slope ‘mooning’ as she went.
As far as possible carers must try and keep their routines flexible. Some days will be better than others and it can be very difficult to keep a sense of proportion and priority. A sufferer should never be forced to try and do something but coaxed and gently persuaded. If there is refusal then if possible leave that particular task for a while and return to it later. The ideal is to tackle the problem together and not for the carer to take over. If only life were so easy!
*30/128/5*

Prescription meds without a prescription

Posted in General health.

Tagged with .


THE OPHTHALMIC CONTROVERSY OVER RADIAL KERATOTOMY

Several years ago in Marietta, Georgia, 32-year-old nearsighted Alfred Gresham, an engineer, underwent RK for his right eye. Gresham was ready to have his left eye operated on for curing his nearsightedness, but the man found himself caught in the middle of a small but polite war between his eye surgeon and the Georgia Ophthalmological Society. This professional body, warning of the danger of possible delayed side-effects from the RK operation which is spreading rapidly in the United States and overseas, persuaded Georgia state hospitals to temporarily ban the procedure in their operating rooms. Studies which by now have convinced most ophthalmologists that RK is a valid, safe, effective operation for permanent correction of nearsightedness had not yet been carried out.
Gresham told us then that he was “mad as hell” about the “medical politics” which might have prevented the operation on his right eye until the Georgia Ophthalmological Society conducted what could be a multi-year investigation “to determine the procedure’s effectiveness  and safety.” This is still sometimes found to be the attitude expressed by some traditionalists in ophthalmology who don’t have training in performing radial keratotomy or the other breakthrough methods of high-tech vision improvement.
Until  the   fall  of   1984,   with  presentation   of  the Prospective Evaluation  of Radial  Keratotomy,  PERK  study, the   American   Association   of  Ophthalmology   (AAO) considered  the  RK  procedure  investigational  rather  than experimental.  Surgeons   who  supported  the  procedure   -numbering   among   them  some   of   the   nation’s   most distinguished  professors  and  eye  surgeons,  including  one former president of  the  AAO  -  agreed  that  the  answers won’t  be all put together  about side  effects  until  patients have  reached  the  post-surgery  mark  twenty  years  from now.  But,  based  on  experience  with  more-complex  corneal surgery and  with accidental  corneal  injury,  they foresee  no serious problems ahead.
Nevertheless, controversy in ophthalmology about refractive surgery continues. It is rife and disagreements are heated among eye physicians when it comes to RK. For example, Long Island, New York ophthalmologist Norman O. Stahl, M.D., was banned from doing RK at his hospital. He could not practice the procedure there and warnings came down from the administration office that he might be thrown out if he continued to try. Dr. Stahl responded by setting up a surgical suite in his private office. No one could stop him from performing the dozens of myopia-correction procedures there.
Since Dr. Stahl took this step, in fact, in-office surgery – called “office-based surgery” – not only for eyes but for a host of other body problems has become rather common. An entirely new medical industry to cut the cost of medical care by eliminating hospital expenses has arisen with the new office-based surgery.
At least  four  professional  groups  have  been  pooling data about RK in  order  to  make  some judgments about its safety and effectiveness. They include the National Institute of Health-funded multi-university study headed by George Waring, M.D. of Atlanta, Georgia; the National Refractive Keratotomy study group under the direction of Leo Bores, M.D., of Santa Fe, New Mexico; the Kerato-Refractive Society, under secretary Ronald Schachar, M.D., of Dennison, Texas; and the International Corneal Plastic Micro-Surgery Society, coordinated by Herbert L. Gould, M.D. of White Plains, New York. Additionally, the National Advisory Eye Council has put out a call to all patients who have undergone RK and to all optometrists who have refracted the eyes of such patients to report their observations.
The National Advisory Eye Council is the principal advisory group to the National Eye Institute. In order to discharge its responsibilities to the American public and to the scientific and health care community, the Council has acquired as much information as possible about the safety of RK on humans. The Council has urged people to share whatever information they may possess abut eye problems that have resulted from this surgical procedure.
In addition to complications of the cooperative effort itself, the Council members were looking for any secondary problems, such, as ocular rupture or perforation. Ronald G. Geller, Ph.D., Executive Secretary of the National Eye Institute, advises interested physicians and patients about his survey results. They indicate that no such problems or side effects exist for recipients of radial keratotomy.
Some opponents of RK have attempted to suppress the availability of the operation. They tried to institute a moratorium on the procedure to be done. They also encouraged health insurance companies not to reimburse patients who ordinarily would be covered for financial outlays.
*30/127/5*

Order ED pills online

Posted in General health.

Tagged with .


ALTERNATIVES TO NURSING HOMES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: DECIDING BETWEEN HOME CARE AND DAY CARE, RESPITE CARE

Deciding between home care and day care
A day program may be the right alternative if you are worried about the care someone coming to your home might provide. They can offer more peace of mind because of their visibility. There is less chance of mistreatment when so many people are watching than there might be in the privacy of your relative’s home. They also offer a more stimulating environment. They may be less costly than one-to-one care. Also, when you choose a day hospital, medical and nursing services are there, lessening the work of orchestrating these visits on your own. However, in general day care does not offer the flexibility of home care. Centers tend to serve a more limited group, people who qualify for the program. Your relative may be barred from a program if there is a change in medical condition or if behavioral problems develop. The hours are more rigid. Services tend to be available only on weekdays. And because patients cannot attend the program during an acute illness, choosing this alternative means being more vulnerable to the need for other arrangements. Because it is even more difficult to go somewhere strange than to have someone strange come in, it also may be harder to convince your loved one to attend a daycare program. So if convenience is a main consideration, home care is a better choice.
Respite care
This newest and therefore least widespread program is specifically for caregivers, to give them a break from the burden of ministering fulltime to a disabled family member. The person admitted to respite care periodically enters an inpatient setting -generally a nursing home or geriatric center – for several days or longer so family members can go on vacation or have time off. The major disadvantages of respite care are its limited availability and the fact that no health insurance covers it.
*147/159/5*
GENERAL HEALTH

Posted in General health.

Tagged with .